Posts Tagged ‘boycott’

IT'S THE GUNS, STUPID radio show–episode 10

Saturday, June 28th, 2014

Here are clips from our June 25 IT’S THE GUNS, STUPID radio show

Episode 10


Robyn Thomas is Executive Director of the Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence, a national non-profit organization founded by attorneys focused on providing comprehensive legal research and expertise in support of smart gun laws that save lives.

Do Gun Laws Work? Yes! (w/ Robyn Thomas)

How Any State’s Loose Gun Laws Threaten Us All (w/ Robyn Thomas)

The Myth of Gun Self-Defense (Elliot Fineman and Robyn Thomas)

Why Bringing A Gun To Work Is A Bad Idea (Elliot Fineman, Martha Rosenberg
NGVAC Senior Editor)

Why Corporate America Can Not Stay Neutral On Gun Violence (Elliot Fineman)

Why You Should Boycott Hallmark (Elliot Fineman)


Elliot Fineman's oped about Hallmark action appears on the Hill

Monday, June 16th, 2014

June 13, 2014, 10:30 am

A real Father’s Day present for your Dad—your safety


By Elliot Fineman


On Valentine’s Day 2012, National Gun Victims Action Council (NGVAC), a group I founded after my son was killed by a deranged shooter, launched an action against Starbucks called “Brew Not Bullets.” Starbucks had been sanctioning the open and concealed carry of firearms in their stores, a clear threat to the safety of Starbuck’s employees and patrons.

First, with a boycott of Starbucks, that company found out the hard way that when people from all walks of life join forces to protect their families, those who ignore our basic right to life will lose every time. Since then—due to our work and that of other great organizations advocating for gun safety—a number of other companies from Chipotle to Chili’s have followed suit.

In doing so, they’ve stood up to vocal “open carry” advocates, honoring not only the overwhelming sentiment of their customers, but the innocent lives taken in such spaces.  This includes that of my son—who was minding his own business having dinner with his wife in a San Diego restaurant when he was shot and killed by a mentally ill man who should never have had a gun.

Accordingly, the Newtown Victims & Clergy for Corporate Responsibility (NVCCR) and NGVAC decided to take the next step. We sent a letter to Hallmark Cards asking them to publicly support and proactively advocate for universal background checks.

Sadly, however, even though Hallmark says on its website it has “high standards of ethics and integrity,” and believes in “caring and responsible corporate citizenship for…each community in which we operate,” in response to our request, Hallmark Chairman Donald Hall, Jr. sang quite a different tune. He responded dismissively, refusing to meet with us, and saying, “We do not get involved in divisive issues.”

Sorry Mr. Hall, but that’s not going to cut it anymore.Hallmark bans guns in its corporate headquarters to protect its CEO and senior management, so why has the company deliberately chosen not to require Hallmark Gold Crown® stores to do the same? This would seem to send a message that the lives of Hallmark executives are more important than those of their customers, who buy their cards and pay their salaries.

Of course, no matter what Hall says, Hallmark clearly is involved in this divisive issue, because to not ban guns or support universal background checks is a pro-gun stance. Further, Hallmark takes strong stands on other issues and pays its eight lobbyists over $500,000 per year to try to pass laws related to postage, radio, television and taxes. One thinks they easily add gun safety to their portfolio, and what a difference they could make.

According to NGVAC’s analysis of a Johns Hopkins Center for GunPolicy and Research study of the rise in gun homicides when Missouri repealed its background check Universal background checks would reduce gun homicides by 2,000 lost lives per year,

Polling shows that 91 percent of Americans, including 74 percent of NRA members want universal background checks. Given these numbers, refusing to support universal background checks is not only a disgraceful moral abdication, but an incredibly ill-thought-out business decision.

To quote my friends, the Rev. Matthew Crebbin, Senior Pastor of Newtown Congregational Church and co-chair of NVCCR, and Rabbi Shaul Praver of the Newtown Synagogue,  “We can no longer let corporate America stand on the sidelines ignoring their ethical and moral responsibilities. We have seen where that gets us, with yet another slaughter of our children in Santa Barbara. By refusing to support universal background checks, Hallmark has turned its back on gun victims, as well as the American people.”

Over 5,000 fathers lose their lives to gun homicides each year, according to NGVAC’s analysis of CDC and FBI data. This figure does not include the number of fathers who have lost their children to gun violence, like myself, who can no longer celebrate another Father’s Day with their loved ones.

That’s why NVCCR and NGVAC are asking the public not to buy Hallmarkcards for Father’s Day. Instead we ask that you give a custom designed NGVAC Shattered Heart™ Father’s Day card, which can be downloaded free or sent electronically.

The truth is, if corporations were willing to get behind our families’ right to public safety, something 9 out of every 10 of their customers supports, we would have universal background checks tomorrow. Hallmark could have been a leader on this issue, but instead Mr. Hall’ chosen to be on the wrong side of history.

But he can’t hide behind a talking point. His customers understand that our lives are more important than his platitudes.

Fineman is CEO and president of National Gun Victims Action Council.




Tuesday, July 24th, 2012


In the last eighteen years, not one law has been passed at the federal level to reduce gun violence. However, many laws that will increase gun violence have been passed. And despite our broken hearts and anguish for the victims of the Aurora killer, no one foresees any changes to our insane gun laws. Left to the politicians, our legal protections from gun violence will continue to erode.

WHAT WILL IT TAKE? Until major corporations decide to act responsibly and stand up to the NRA, there will be no sane gun laws. The major corporations have far more money and legislative influence than the NRA—unfortunately, most do not have the will.

Starbucks was let to come to the conclusion it did not want guns. They initially said “In the end, we determined that following local (State) laws is the best approach for us.” However, local (State) laws allow them to ban guns; thus they reveal their conscious choice to allow them. Chains like California Pizza Kitchen, Peets, IKEA, and Disney, others they have banned guns from their stores to protect their customers and employees.

Knowing the threat people carrying guns pose, all corporations we are aware of ban guns from their corporate headquarters and from shareholder meetings. Nor are store employees allowed to bring guns to work in almost all cases.  Why are customers not afforded the same protections when corporations obviously recognize the danger?

HOW TO GET SANE GUN CONTROL LAWS? Use our consumer buying power to force major corporations to become aggressive advocates for sane gun control laws.


The National Gun Victims Action Council (NGVAC)* called a boycott of Starbucks that started on Valentine’s Day, 2012. The campaign cost Starbucks 10,000 loyal long-term customers who stopped spending $5 million per year. As other groups joined the action, Starbucks saw that a clear majority of the nation and its customers  do not want guns present where they drink coffee. A year and a half after NGVAC initiated this action, Starbucks officially “disinvited” gun from its coffee shops. It is an example of how corporate America has the power to effect change while politicians have passed no laws to reduce gun violence at the federal level for 20 years.



Rand Paul And Guns Stall Extension Of The Patriot Act

Friday, May 27th, 2011

The Kentucky Republican has objected to an attempt by Senate leadership to consider the national security measure on an expedited basis. His objections are not necessarily driven by ideological opposition to the bill, though he remains an outspoken critic. Instead Paul has dug in his heels because Senate Democrats have refused to consider several amendments that he wants offered, chief among them language that would restrict national online casino security officials from examining gun dealer records in an effort to track potential terrorists

Gun safety groups had been frantically trying to draw attention to the amendment — which had gone largely under the radar — arguing that it would it would curtail the Department of Justice”s already limited authority to inspect the records of firearms licensees.